Chondromalacia Patellae and Patellofemoral OA
Chondromalacia is a pathological description and means cartilage softening
Patellofemoral OA may be seen as the end result of progression of chondromalacia
Aetiology
Chrisman " The role of articular cartilage in patellofemoral pain" OCNA 17:231, 1986
- Trauma ( or repeated microtrauma) may initiate cartilage degeneration by initiating the release of PGE2, causing increased synthesis of proteases which break up matrix proteins. This creates a vicious cycle where more destruction and inflammation ensue.
50% idiopathic
15% post traumatic
20% secondary to maltracking- lateral patellar compression syndrome
15% due to unstable (recurrent dislocaters) patellae
Wiberg: described 3 types of patella morphology- found no association bw patellar shape and chondromalacia
ref: Wiberg G. Roentgenographic and anatomic studies of the patellofemoral jt. With special reference to chondromalacia patella. Acta Orthop Scand 12:319, 1941
- Equal medial and lateral facets which are both slightly concave (normal anatomy)
- Smaller medial than lateral facet, medial facet is flat or slightly convex
- Very small medial facet which is convex
- Without a medial ridge or medial facet ( described by Baumgartl, 1944)
Classification: (Outerbridge)
ref: Outerbridge "The aetiology of Chondromalacia Patellae" JBJS 46B: 179, 1961
- Stage I:
- Localised softening of the cartilage with minimal or no break in the surface
- Stage II:
- Fissuring within the softened area (often longitudinal 'shark' gill type)
- Stage III:
- Breakdown of the surface and fibrillation extending down to subchondral bone
- Stage IV:
- Really early osteoarthritis ® erosive changes and exposure of subchondral bone, usually also involves the opposite articular surface (more often the lateral than the medial femoral surface)
Pathology
Cartilage becomes soft, swollen and spongy, the surface looses its lustre and becomes fissured and fibrillated
Superficial cartilage damage is painless but does not heal
Deep cartilage damage is painful and may attempt to heal by the formation of fibro-cartilage
The patient is usually female and reports diffuse pain in the front (anterior knee pain) of the knee especially after bent knee activities (stairs, sitting etc)
Treatment
Conservative
- rest
- Activity modification
- Quads training- esp VMO- SLR type are best ( are isometric), after some strength has ben achieved can start short arc isotonic exercises in last 30o of extension. NB- knee exercise from 90o to full ext with weight on the ankle is contraindicated as applies high load on PF jt
- NSAID- may have protective role in artic cartilage by decreasing PG synthesis
- McConnell program
ref: McConnell J "The management of chondromalacia patellae- along term solution" Aust J Physiother 32: 215, 1986
- stretching of tight lateral restraints
- taping of patella to maintain stretch
- VMO training
This program will help in ~ 60% of cases
Operative
- Patellar shaving- unstable flaps of cartilage are removed
- Subchondral bone drilling , cortical abrasion, and spongialisation
- all aim to encourage fibrocartilage ingrowth from the underlying cancellous bone
- Lateral release- useful in the pt with lateral patellar tilt, without subluxation
(if subluxation as well- need to realign either prox or dist)
- useful in ~60%
- Elevation of the tibial tubercle- aims to reduce contact pressures- Maquet calculated that a 2 cm advancement of the tibial tuberosity would reduce contact forces by 50%. Most of the force reduction occurs in the initial 1-1.5 cm of elevation - this is now the recommended distance for advancement
- Results:
:Maquet procedure ( Rozbruk etal Orthop Trans 3:291, 1979)
-60% satis results in 30 knees at 1-5 yrs
-complications- skin necrosis, infection
:Fulkerson procedure ( Fulkerson etal " Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft" Am J Sports Med 18: 490, 1990)
-89% satis results in 30 knees ,greater than 2 yr FU
- no skin sloughs or infections
- Patellar resurfacing- not indicated- poor long term results
- Patellectomy- last resort
the patella increases the moment arm of the quads mechanism
patellectomised knees have a decreased torque cf normal side of ~ 50%- this leads to difficulties in stair climbing and rising from chairs
Ref: Kelly and Insall " patellectomy" OCNA 17:289, 1986
Lewis etal " Patellectomy- an analysis of 100 cases" JBJS 58A: 736, 1976
Lennox etal "Knee function after patellectomy" JBJS 76B:485-487, 1994
- excellent or good in ~ 75% of pts ( ~ 50% in PF OA)
- poorer results with cont weakness / instability- thus must rehab pts aggressively
Ref : Fulkerson and Shea " Disorders of patellofemoral alignment" JBJS 72A: 1424-1429, 1990
Knee Ligament Problems
Definitions:
- Instability:
- Abnormal increased range of motion due to ligamentous, capsular, meniscal, cartilage or bone injury / abnormality
- Strain:
- Stretching injury to a musculo tendinous attachment to bone
- Sprain:
- Injury limited to ligaments (connective tissue attaching bone to bone)
Injury ®
stretch or tear ligament fibres but does not completely disrupt the ligament (as apposed to ligament rupture)
- 1st Degree sprain:
- Tearing of minimal fibres resulting in local tenderness and no instability
- 2nd Degree sprain:
- Partial tear of the ligament with increased loss of function and joint reaction again with no instability
- 3rd Degree sprain:
- Complete tear or disruption resulting in instability
The instability is graded according to its severity
+ (0 - 5mm) laxity
++ (5 - 10mm) laxity
+++ (> 10mm) laxity
Clinically:
Effusion, contusion swelling, tenderness over ligament insertions are characteristic
Arteriography should be performed if injury suspicious of vascular injury
If both cruciates and either collaterals disrupted probably dislocated knee and high incidence of vascular damage
Haemarthrosis:
- ACL rupture (accounts for 70% of haemarthrosies)
Acute patella dislocation
Osteochondral fracture
Peripheral meniscal tear
Pathology:
Single collagen fibres are not extensible and begin to fail at elongations of 7% to 8%
The number of fibres disrupted determines if the ligament is functionally or morphologically disrupted
Complete disruption requires extreme joint displacement
- Ligament Healing;
- Phase 1: Acute inflammation occurs in the first 24 hours and is associated with haematoma formation and acute inflammation
Phase 2: Repair and regeneration (48 - 72 hours post injury continuing for ~ 6/52) ®
subsidence of inflammation and commencement of healing
Phase 3: Remodelling and maturation (requires 6 - 9 months)
Contraction of ligament ®
change collagen predominance with increased cross linking and increased tensile strength
The original strength is not reached (probably 50 - 70%)
Isolated Grade III ACL and PCL injuries do not heal as they are not contained in a vascularised bed (not all however ®
functional disability)
Treatment:
Goal of treatment is to restore the anatomy and stability to as near pre injury status as possible
EUA and arthroscopy often indicated
Knee Instability
Ref : Committee on Research and Education of the American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine Research and Education Committee, 1976
- Classified as straight ( nonrotatory) or rotatory ( simple or combined)
Straight instability
- Medial Opens
- with valgus stress test in full extension- indicates tear MCL, med capsular lig, ACL, posterior oblique lig and the medial portion of the post capsule- the PCL may be also torn but not necessarily so
Opens with valgus stress test in 30°
flexion- indicates tear to med lig only
- Lateral
- Opens with varus stress test in full extension- indicates tear of lat capsular lig, LCL, and commonly PCL
Opens with varus stress test in 30°
flexion- may be present in minor lat complex tears or may be normal
- Posterior Demonstrated by posterior drop back of the tibia with no rotation
- indicates tear of PCL, arcuate lig complex, posterior oblique lig complex
- Anterior
- Demonstrated by the anterior drawer test in neutral rotation with both tibial condyles subluxing anteriorly with no rotation. In this type of instability the test becomes negative as the tibia is internally rotated as in this posotion the PCL becomes taut
- indicates tears of ACL, lat capsular lig, med capsular lig
Rotatory instability
- Anteromedial
- tear of med capsular lig, MCL, post oblique lig, ACL
the med tibial plateau subluxes forward on the femur
The medial meniscus is an important adjunct to anteromed stability- thus should be conserved if at all possible
Repair of the posterior oblique lig is essential for stability
- Anterolateral
- tear of lat capsular lig, arcuate complex, ACL
results in excess internal rotation of the tibia on the femur at 90°
flexion
With an internal rotation /varus stress injury, an avulsion fracture of the attachment of the lateral capsule from the tibia may occur (= Segond fracture)- high assoc with torn ACL
- Posterolateral
- the lat tibial plateau rotates posteriorly wrt the femur with lateral opening of the jt
implies tear of popliteus tendon, arcuate complex, lat capsular lig, occasionally the PCL, and the biceps from its insertion
-results in an ER subluxation where the tibia rotates about an axis of the intact PCL
- Posteromedial
- the medial tibial plateau rotates posteriorly wrt the femur with med opening of the jt
implies tear of MCL, posterior oblique lig, ,ACL, med portion of posterior capsule. May be stretching / injury to semimembranosus tendon
- Combined
- Anterolat- anteromed combined: results from tears of ACL and both med and lat capsular ligs in their middle third. PCL is intact
-the ant drawer test is markedly positive in neutral, exaggerated in ER, but negative in IR ( PCL tightens in IR)
Anterolat- posterolat combined: results from tear of all of the lat comp capsular ligs and ACL, with or without tear of the iliotibial band , PCL remains intact
- varus instability marked, Ant + post drawer tests in neutral show lat tibial plateau rotation ant + post
Anteromed- posteromed combined: medial and posteromed structures are torn with ACL and often PCL
- valgus instability marked, ant + post drawer tests in neutral show med tibial plateau rotation ant and post
Medial Collateral Ligament
Anatomy:
- Superficial layer:
- A continuation of the deep fascia of the thigh
- Middle layer:
- Superficial medial ligament from medial condyle just below the adductor tubercle to medial subcutaneous surface of the tibia 6 - 7cm below the joint line behind the axis of rotation
- Deep layer:
- Condensation in the medial joint capsule from the medial epicondyle of the femur to the medial meniscus and via the coronary ligament to the tibia
Natural History of disruption:
Healing of mid substance tear not improved by surgery
Bony avulsions respond well to reattachment
Treatment:
Isolated MCL injury- early motion +/- bracing depending on the severity of the injury
Ref: Indelicato etal CORR 256: 174-177, 1990
- concluded complete isolated tears of the MCL can be successfully managed nonsurgically provided there is no associated meniscal or ACL damage
If MCL injury assoc with another major ligamentous injury eg ACL/PCL then surgery is
indicated -but repair /reconstruction of the ACL or PCL may be all that is necessary
Hughston JBJS 76A: 1328, 1994 - in MCL tears with ACL tears- advocates treatment of the ACL only in the case of a 1+ or 2+ medial instability. However , in those with 3+ med instability he states that these must have a posteromedial disruption and this should be repaired with emphasis on repair of the post oblique lig and semimembranosus insertion
Lateral Collateral Ligament
Anatomy:
- Superficial layer:
- The ilio-tibial band continuous with deep fascia inserts into the antero-lateral surface of the proximal tibia (Gerdy's Tubercle)
- Middle layer:
- Superficial lateral ligament from the lateral epicondyle to the styloid process of the fibula and is tight in extension but lax in flexion (femoral attachment lies behind the axis of rotation)
- Deep layer:
- Capsular thickening which is poorly developed and runs from the lateral condyle to the head of the fibula and does not attach to the meniscus ®
lateral meniscus is more mobile
Natural History of disruption:
Usually associated with cruciate injuries or posterolat corner injuries and significant instability
Isolated LCL injuries are rare and can be treated nonsurgically
If assoc secondary restraints are torn- therefore if complete lateral complex injury (ie opens in extension) should be repaired
Direct repair +/- biceps tenodesis to lateral epicondyle of femur
Chronic instability- advancement , augmentation or reconstruction
eg ITB augmentation, biceps tenodesis of the posterolat corner
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
- Anatomy:
- Tibial attachment is on the non articular surface of the tibial plateau extending from just behind the medial and lateral spines forward for about 3cm
Femoral attachment is the lateral and posterior portion of the medial femoral condyle in the inter condylar notch and some fibres of the ligament are taut in all positions of the knee
Anterior fibres are the most isometric with the postero-lateral fibres relaxing somewhat in flexion
No fibres are truly isometric but the antero-medial fibres have the least variation in length (~ 1.5mm)
Most of the fibres of the ACL are taught in extension
Primary function is to prevent anterior displacement of the tibia on the femur
- Pathology:
- Unhappy triad of O'Donaghue ®
MCL, ACL and medial meniscus
As MCL attaches to the meniscus disruption forces ®
pull on the MCL may disrupt the medial meniscus and if strain sufficient will go on to rupture the ACL
- Natural History of disruption:
- 70% of these injuries are sustained during sporting activities-mainly in non contact sports involving jumping or cutting
50% of all acute ACL tears are assoc with meniscal tears
Conservative treatment is not satisfactory in high risk patients (conservative treatment resulting in unsatisfactory results in 60 - 85% of patients) where as satisfactory results are achieved in 85 - 95% of reconstructed patients
For low risk patients non operative treatment is satisfactory in 85 - 90% of cases
ref: Ciciotti etal JBJS 76A:1315-1321, 1994
52 pts with ACL rupture bw 40-60 yo, 30 followed av 7 yrs
25 of these 30 pts had good result with nonop treatment
- Treatment:
- ACL injury in the skeletally immature
Conservative treatment and muscle exercises
Avoid any procedure involving bony tunnelling until skeletal maturity
If indicated ®
extra-articular reconstruction (eg McIntosh repair)
McIntosh procedure: Iliotibial band mobilised proximally and re-routed beneath the LCL around the intermuscular septum and back beneath the LCL to be reattached to Gerdies tubercle
Therefore reconstruct if:
less than 35 years of age and closed growth plates
Moderate to severe instability
Participates in high risk sports or work
Rehabilitation:
Post operation ®
CPM 0 - 90o
Mobilise in a splint when leg control and allow 0 - 90o ROM in the splint for 3 weeks
Physio ®
ROM exercises and muscle toning ®
mobilise unrestrained after 3 weeks
Recommence activity on the basis of muscle tone, power and control and when within 90% of normal power ®
resume sporting activities
Posterior Cruciate Ligament
- Anatomy:
- From the medial surface of the inter condylar notch to a groove in the posterior surface of the tibia below the level of the articular surface
There are no truly isometric fibres but the most posterior portion has the least variation in length
Most of the fibres of the PCL are lax in extension becoming taught in flexion limiting anterior displacement of the femur on the tibia in flexion
The average length of the PCL is 38mm and the diameter is 13mm with a width of 8mm
Posterior menisco-femoral ligament of Wrisberg extends from the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the femur behind the PCL and the anterior menisco-femoral ligament of Humphrey if present passes in front of the PCL
- Mechanism of injury
- post directed force on a flexed knee
forced hyperextension
posterior rotatory force
- Natural History of disruption:
- Isolated PCl injuries rarely assoc with meniscal pathology and result in little functional disability
85 - 90% satisfactory results despite persistent laxity in the PCL and surgical repair is recommended for bony avulsions only
Many are only slightly impaired and return to sport without reconstruction
Increased shear forces transmitted to articular surfaces may lead to early degenerative arthritis
At this time there is not sufficient evidence to prove the benefit of surgical reconstruction over non operative treatment
Surgical intervention reserved for those who fail conservative therapy, those with combined ligamentous injury, those with multidirectional instability
Surgical options include: primary repair with augmentation with semitendinosus/ gracilis
reconst with patellar tendon or achilles tendon auto- or allo-graft
Maintenance of quads strength emphasised, hamstring strengthening delayed
Dislocated Knees
- Classification (anatomical)
- anterior (hyperextension injury)
Posterior (direct force to the tibia)
Medial
Lateral
Rotational
- Pathology:
- At least three of the four major ligaments as well as capsule must be ruptured in order for the knee to dislocate
- Complications:
- Arterial injury in 30 - 40% of cases with anterior or posterior dislocations usually at the level of the adductor hiatus or the trifurcation of tibial vessels
Amputation rate for knee dislocation are ~10%
Peroneal nerve palsies in 20-40%- half are permanent
- Treatment:
- Dependant on general state of patient and demand on the leg
Arthroscopy not indicated as ®
soft tissue extravasation
Usually ®
primary repair of external ligaments and capsule and subsequent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate if found to be necessary.
Bony avulsions should be repaired acutely & CPM used post operatively
Osteoarthritis of the knee
OA is almost certainly attributable to mechanical derangement. The initial problem is raised contact pressures in articular cartilage leading to fragmentation of the collagen fibre network, progressive loss of cartilage and eventual exposure of subchondral bone.
Eg OA due to # malunion, genu varum, post medial meniscectomy
As the cartilage becomes less capable of taking load, the subjacent bone becomes more dense in response to loading. The reduced compliance of the subchondral bone further contributes to the loss of articular cartilage. Osteophytes form in an attempt to increase the weight bearing area.
Adult mature chondrocytes do not appear to be able to undergo mitosis- Chondrocyte clustering is probably due to loss of matrix between previously separated cells rather than from cell division
Thus true healing of an articular cartilage defect cannot occur- However, healing by scar formation can occur ie healing by fibrocartilage derived from underlying cancellous bone. For this to occur need to have connection bw jt and underlying cancellous bone eg by drilling. For this fibrocartilage to persist and effectively line the jt surface - need to remove the primary mechanical cause for the initial cartilage destruction eg by osteotomy
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis involves the generalised destruction of cartilage by lysosomal enzymes.
The cartilage is weakened by enzymatic attack and is more susceptible to mechanical destruction
The synovitis is attributable to to the presence of articular cartilage - the synovitis is cured by removal of the artic cartilage eg in TJR or arthrodesis
Management
Synovectomy if fail to respond to medical management and no evidence of joint destruction
Tibial osteotomy, many feel this is contraindicated due to bi-compartmental disease process
Arthrodesis, only if hip normal, usually reserve for failed TKR or when TKR can not be performed
TKR; Loosening ~ 1.3%
Infection ~ 0.4%
Pain relief 95%
Cement fixation and replacement of all cartilaginous surfaces advocated by many surgeons
Synovectomy of the Knee
- Indications RA
- PVNS
Synovial chondromatosis
Haemophilic synovitis
- Rheumatoid:
- Synovectomy reduces at least temporarily the pain and synovitis of RA
pts should have failed at least 6 mths of maximal nonoperative treatment
surgical: may be open or arthroscopic
ref: Olgilvie-Harris and Basinski " Arthroscopic synovectomy for RA"
Arthroscopy 7: 91-97, 1991
- 4 yr FU : 21% had pain at 4 yrs vs 56% preop
24% ha d synovitis vs 100% preop
Arthroscopic synovectomy
- advantages- low morbidity, ¯
infection, better ROM post op
- results similar to open synovectomy
Chemical: eg with alkylating agents - rarely done as damage to cartilage
Radiation: eg Yttrium 90
Dysprosium 165(attached to ferric hydroxide macroaggregates)
ref: Sledge etal " Intraarticular radiation synovectomy" CORR 182:37, 1984
- satisfactory results in 50% at 3 yrs
- Haemophilia:
- ref: Rivard etal JBJS 76A: 482-488, 1994
92 synoviortheses on 48 pts with haemophilia
reduced episodes of haemarthrosis
better ROM maintenance than after synovectomy
no need for extra factor replacement
procedure almost painless
does not alter the rate of jt degeneration ( same for synovectomy) - suggesting that once initated, haemophilic arthropathy progresses regardless of treatment
Total Knee Replacement
The primary stabilisers about the knee are ligaments and muscles as the bony contours offer little resistance to displacement
Walking on level ground the joint is subject to three times body weight and going up stairs four times body weight due to the effect of muscle action
The load to the tibia is not distributed evenly with the medial tibial plateau taking greater load than the lateral
Bone grafting of tibial plateau indicated if > 50% of the plateau ®
defect or if cement column under prosthesis would measure > 5mm in height
Indications for TKR
Primary objectives:
- To relieve pain
- To provide motion with stability
- To correct deformity
In the presence of appropriate symptomatology, TKR is indicated in:
- RA- regardless of age , including JCA
- OA- consider age, wght, occupation,sex, activity level
avoid in <60 yo, manual labourers, high demand pts, obese
- post traumatic OA- a rare indication in the younger pt
- Failure of HTO
- Patellofemoral OA- rare in isolation- if so , the best treatment in the older pt is TKR
- Neuropathic jt- controversial - Insall believes it is feasible as long as correct alignment and stability are achieved
Contraindications for TKR:
- Neuropathic joint (see above)
- Recent or current sepsis
- Age (relative)
- stable arthrodesis- prospects of a successful arthroplasty are not good, a constrained prosthesis is usually required, in the event of failure rearthrodesis may not succeed
- Genu Recurvatum- assoc with muscular weakness or paralysis - is likely to recur following TKR and places stresses on the prosthesis which increase likelihood of loosening
- Quads weakness- arthrodesis better choice
Investigations:
Contemplating uni compartmental replacement ®
bone scan pre operatively and if increased activity on other side do not ®
hemiarthroplasty
Need to accurately assess anatomic/mechanical axes of the jt preop
Technique
Exposure
Routine: Incision - ant midline or med parapatellar
Medial parapatellar tendon capsular incision usual - alternatives include the subvastus approach where the V. medialis is reflected lat , and the lat approach sometimes used in the valgus knee
Difficult exposures: when exposing a stiff or ankylosed knee the standard exposure will risk damage to the tibial tubercle- options include:
- Quads turndown- a narrow inverted V incision distally based, extended until the patella can be everted
- Rectus Snip- standard approach but at the apex of the quads tendon incision continued laterally across the tendon
- Tibial tubercle osteotomy- a long portion ~ 3-6 cm in length is elevated - must be fixed back with screws
Limb alignment
Varus or valgus malalignment is assoc with increased component loosening
Aim for mechanical axis passing through middle of prox tibia
Prox tibia cut 90o
to its longitudinal axis
Distal femur cut approx 6o valgus
Both extra- and intra- medullary guides are available- use extramedullary when deformity is present eg tibial bowing , malunion of fracture
Ligament balance
ensure flexion and extension gaps are equal
if ligament rebalancing is needed - best done by appropriate releases rather than advancements
If fixed deformities greater than 15o, the best results for correction are obtained by excision of the PCL and use of a cruciate substituting prosthesis
- Varus release
remove med osteophytes from the prox tibia
raise a sleeve of soft tissue from the prox tibia that is allowed to slide proximally- includes periosteum, deep and superfic med lig, insertion of the pes tendons
- Valgus release NB risk of peroneal nerve palsy
Order of release:
- 1. ITB from Gerdys tubercle
2. Lat capsular attachments to the tibia
3. Posterolat capsule +/- PCL
4. Popliteus tendon
5. LCL
6. Lat head of gastroc
7. lat intermusc septum with V lateralis
- May be coupled with medial soft tissue advancement in which case lateral release usually restricted to ilio-tibial band and postero-lateral joint capsule
If ®
advancement of medial structures splint leg post op for 3 - 4 weeks
Flexion release:
- more prox femoral bone resection
r/o post osteophytes
Elevation of post capsule +/- release of the PCL
Post capsule can be divided transversely near to the origin from the femur with great care
In order to minimise bone resection ®
division or stripping of posterior capsular attachment to the femur which may include both heads of gastroc.Additional resection from the distal femur then undertaken if unable to obtain full extension
Component Orientation
- Sagittal:
- most systems aim for 3-7o posterior slope
too much femoral comp extension may ®
notching ant femur ®
risk #
too much femoral comp flexion®
FFD
- Axial:
- IR of the tibial comp ®
lat displacement of the tibial tubercle®
Q angle
®patellar maltracking
-align tibial comp to point to med 1/3 of tibial tubercle
IR of femoral comp also affects patellar tracking- aim for 3-4°
ER of femoral component to improve patellar tracking- this amount of rotation also helps equalise collateral structure balancing as the lat collat structures are slightly more lax in flexion
- Jt line:
- level of jt line should be maintained as close to normal as possible- esp if using PCL retaining design where tension of the retained PCL must be as normal as possible to ensure FROM and even pressure transfer throughout the range to the tibial component
- Patellar Tracking
- lateral release if required
Component Design
The PCL
3 major designs
- PCL sacrificing
- PCL sacrificing with substitution
- PCL retaining
Advantages of preserving the PCL:
- restore more normal knee motion- including axial rotation of the tibia and roll back of femur on tibia
- maintain proprioception of the PCL
- maintain load transfers by PCL
- in gait analysis pts with retained PCL have a more normal stair climbing gait- no difference in level gait
Disadvantages of preserving PCL:
- more difficult collateral balancing
- need to reproduce the preop jt line- or get
jt reaction forces®
wear
- partial release of the PCL may be necessary for correct ligament balance
- exposure may be more difficult in PCL retention
Good results obtained in all types:
ref: Vince etal "the total condylar prosthesis: 10-12 yr results of a cemented knee replacement" JBJS 71B:793-797, 1989
- 88% good or excellent ( PCL sacrificing)
Scott etal JBJS 70A: 1163-1173, 1988
- 83% good or excellent after 2-8 yrs ( posterior stabilised)
Wright etal JBJS 72A: 1003-1009, 1990
- 90% good or excellent after 5-9 yrs ( PCL retaining)
Fixation
Cement remains the gold standard
ref Scuderi etal "Survivorship of cemented knee replacements"
JBJS 71B: 798-803 , 1989
- posterior stabilised prosthesis- 15 yr success rate of 90%
- all poly tibia - 10 yr success rate of 97%
- metal backed tibia- 7 yr success rate of 98.75%
Cementless tibial components are more prone to failure than cemented - probably due to failure to obtain sufficient initial stability for adequate bone ingrowth
Thus hybrid TKR is now being performed- early results are equal to all cemented
ref: Wright etal CORR 260: 80-86, 1990
- hybrid - good or excellent in 93%
no sign of component loosening
Polyethylene
wear influenced by: limb alignment, component design, presence of metal backing, poly thickness, modularity
less conforming surfaces have more point loading ®
wear
Metal backing - may lead to use of poly which is too thin- need min 8mm thick poly
may get wear bw poly and metal backing
Prognosis:
- 94% 11 year survival for total condylar prosthesis
Specific Groups
TKR after Patellectomy
- ref: Joshi etal JBJS 76B: 926-929, 1994
- 19 pts, av FU 63 mths , high complication rate - 36% overall
3 supracondylar #'s, 3 coronal instabilities ( no AP instabilities)
- TKR in severe deformity
ref: Karachalios etal JBJS 76B: 938-942, 1994
- 51 knees with varus or valgus >20 deg
14 knees had persisting deformity esp in the case of valgus , 4 knees with valgus > 30 deg had lat dislocation / subluxation of the patella post TKR
Complications of TKR
Intra operative
- neurovascular damage
arterial damage rare - < .05%
Peroneal n damage- usually in correction of flexion and valgus deformity
- prognosis - all have partial recovery, 1/2 full
- blood loss ~ 1500 ml
- Fat embolism assoc with stemmed intramedullary components and guides
~ 3%
Perioperative
- Wound healing -
problems in RA, diabetes, haematoma, low albumin, leucopenia
- Sepsis: Infection affects 1 - 2.5% of TKRs
Acute sepsis less than 3/12 from operation
Sub acute sepsis less than 1 year from operation
Chronic sepsis more than 1 year from operation
Increased incidence in association with rheumatoid arthritis (? secondary to anti-rheumatic drugs)
35 - 40% due to Staph aureus
treatment
- Long term antibiotic suppression if prosthesis removal not feasible, for low virulence or highly sensitive organisms and the prosthesis not loose
- Debridement, irrigation and suction if in the immediate post operative period (2 - 4 weeks) but chance of sucess not good
Once the infection has been treated the options are
- Removal of implants if excessive bone loss and low demand patient with limited rehab potential- requires prolonged cast/bracing, results are unpredictable
Resection arthroplasty aim for 7o valgus and 15o flexion and if unhappy ®
arthrodesis
- Arthrodesis ®
painless stable extremity with usually 2 - 8cm shortening but often difficult due to bone loss
- resurfacing implants have less bone loss
- ~ 75% fusion rate with ex fixation
- ~ 80% fusion rate with internal fixation eg IM nail, plating
- internal fixation requires a clean wound
- fusion usually in 4-6 mths
- Re implantation in two stages (Insall, 1983) ®
removal of implants followed by 6 weeks appropriate antibiotics and reimplantation if operative site appeared sterile ®
No recurrent infections and good or excellent results in 75%
Insert an antibiotic impregated spacer and reimplant prosthesis between 6 weeks and 3 months after debridement
Reimplantation difficult after about 3/12 due to soft tissue contracture and extensor lag and poor power being the most common problem post-operatively
ref: Windsor, Insall and Urs "2 stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection: further follow up and refinement of indications" JBJS 72A: 272-278, 1990
- Immediate re implantation ®
only 35% success
- Amputation if life threatening infection
multiple failed attempts at control
elderly nonambulant pt
Successful treatment without removal of implants in only ~ 20 - 31% of cases
Postoperative
- DVT evident on venography in 50 - 70% of patients and asymptomatic PE in 17% of patients (prophylaxis with warfarin ®
complications in 17%)
- see section on DVT/PE in HIP notes
- Loss of Quads power
- Limited ROM (less than 90o flexion)
- Fractures:
- Around the prosthesis which may be secondary to stress risers produced by femoral notching (0.6% of knees and 42% are rheumatoid patients)
ORIF should be reserved for patients who do not have osteopenia and where stable fixation can be achieved, and adequate closed r eduction can not be maintained
- Fractures of the patella in 1 - 11% of those replaced ? secondary to AVN or increased tension in quads or excessive resection
-min displaced # - treat in extension splint for 6 wks
- displaced # not involving patellar comp- TBW
- displaced # involving loosened comp- ®
r/o implant as bone stock usually too poor for reimplantation
- Problems of the patella :
- Patellar tendon avulsion
risk in revision, prior HTO
treat with primary repair
- Patellar resurfacing: complications occur in as many as 10% of patients and account for almost 50% of all long term complications of TKR
- include: failure of metal backed components
patellofemoral instability
component loosening
patellar # and AVN
- recommend replace patella in RA and advanced degen changes of patella, preop PF pain
ref: Keblish etal JBJS 76B: 930-937, 1994 "Patellar resurfacing or retention in TKA"
52 pts with bilat TKA - no difference bw the 2 sides
- Patellofemoral instability: causes include-
IR of tibial comp
IR and med translation of fem comp
residual valgus deformity
inadequate resection of bone in resurfacing®
too thick patella
failure to check tracking
- treat by release or distal realignment
- Loosening:
Most common complication and increases with time and in association with more constrained prostheses
Major cause malalignment, poor cement techniques
Wear debris is uncommon in TKR but may be a problem with patella prostheses
Revision TKR
- Preop planning
- physical examination- test for lig integrity
quality of skin
previous incisions
XR full length wght bearing films , routine AP/lat/ sunrise views
-determine patellar position, jt line location, loosening, bone stock loss
CT assess bone stock
Aspiration to rule out infection
- Results
- Elia and Lotke "Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with significant bone loss" CORR 271: 114-121, 1991
-good or excellent in 75%
Friedman etal " results of revision total knee arthroplasty"
CORR 255: 235-241, 1990
- 5.8% failure rate at 5 yrs
Goldberg etal "the results of revision total knee arthroplasty"
CORR 226: 86-92 ,1988
- 46% good or excellent results
- Complications
- infection up to 5%
¯
ROM
risk patellar maltracking
DVT
Component malalignment